<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 27 - Punjab and Haryana High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247100</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the appeal, set aside the impugned order, and directed the Tribunal to reconsider the application for waiver of pre-deposit in accordance with the law. The Court found that the Tribunal had not adequately considered the common use of the trademark by both appellants and had erred in its decision. Parties were instructed to appear before the Tribunal on a specified date for further proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 May 2014 11:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354494" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 27 - Punjab and Haryana High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247100</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the appeal, set aside the impugned order, and directed the Tribunal to reconsider the application for waiver of pre-deposit in accordance with the law. The Court found that the Tribunal had not adequately considered the common use of the trademark by both appellants and had erred in its decision. Parties were instructed to appear before the Tribunal on a specified date for further proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247100</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>