<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 3 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247076</link>
    <description>The appeal involved confirmation of additions under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act totaling Rs.24,71,176 due to delayed TDS payment by an assessee-firm engaged in civil construction. The CIT(A) upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision, emphasizing timely TDS deposit requirements. Additionally, the appeal addressed non-deduction of TDS in relation to specific parties totaling Rs.4,69,269, with the Tribunal directing the CIT(A) to reconsider the issue comprehensively, considering both factual and legal aspects. Consequently, the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed for statistical purposes only, highlighting the need for a well-reasoned decision encompassing all relevant factors.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 May 2014 08:13:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354457" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 3 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247076</link>
      <description>The appeal involved confirmation of additions under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act totaling Rs.24,71,176 due to delayed TDS payment by an assessee-firm engaged in civil construction. The CIT(A) upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision, emphasizing timely TDS deposit requirements. Additionally, the appeal addressed non-deduction of TDS in relation to specific parties totaling Rs.4,69,269, with the Tribunal directing the CIT(A) to reconsider the issue comprehensively, considering both factual and legal aspects. Consequently, the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed for statistical purposes only, highlighting the need for a well-reasoned decision encompassing all relevant factors.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247076</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>