https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247071 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that they did not provide Franchise or Intellectual Property Right services to the other party. The impugned orders were set aside, and the appeals were allowed with consequential relief. en-us Wed, 22 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Nov 2014 15:16:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247071 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that they did not provide Franchise or Intellectual Property Right services to the other party. The impugned orders were set aside, and the appeals were allowed with consequential relief. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 22 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247071