<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 1031 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247062</link>
    <description>The judgment granted leave to amend by including the Assistant Commissioner as a party respondent. The petitioner challenged the orders dated 08.05.2013 and 31.03.2012, seeking to quash and set aside the impugned orders. Ultimately, the judgment quashed and set aside the OIO dated 31.03.2012, remanding the matter to the Adjudicating Authority for a fresh consideration in accordance with the law and on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2015 11:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354425" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 1031 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247062</link>
      <description>The judgment granted leave to amend by including the Assistant Commissioner as a party respondent. The petitioner challenged the orders dated 08.05.2013 and 31.03.2012, seeking to quash and set aside the impugned orders. Ultimately, the judgment quashed and set aside the OIO dated 31.03.2012, remanding the matter to the Adjudicating Authority for a fresh consideration in accordance with the law and on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247062</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>