https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247059 The Court found in favor of the appellant, emphasizing the necessity for any duty demand to be specifically mentioned in the show cause notice and confirmed in the final order. It acknowledged the error in demanding a sum not originally raised in the notice. The Court also agreed that the duty already deposited should be considered sufficient security, preventing the removal of goods without proper safeguards. Additionally, the Court directed the Tribunal not to require the appellant to deposit an additional amount as a precondition for hearing the appeal on its merits, effectively disposing of the Central Excise Appeal. en-us Mon, 09 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 30 Apr 2014 12:16:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247059 The Court found in favor of the appellant, emphasizing the necessity for any duty demand to be specifically mentioned in the show cause notice and confirmed in the final order. It acknowledged the error in demanding a sum not originally raised in the notice. The Court also agreed that the duty already deposited should be considered sufficient security, preventing the removal of goods without proper safeguards. Additionally, the Court directed the Tribunal not to require the appellant to deposit an additional amount as a precondition for hearing the appeal on its merits, effectively disposing of the Central Excise Appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 09 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247059