<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 1022 - Bombay High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247053</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Trial Court&#039;s decision to acquit the respondent in a case challenging an acquittal judgment under the Customs Act and Gold (Control) Act. The prosecution&#039;s evidence was found lacking, with discrepancies and insufficient corroboration leading to the conclusion that the accused did not consciously possess the contraband. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the acquittal order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2014 12:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354416" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 1022 - Bombay High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247053</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Trial Court&#039;s decision to acquit the respondent in a case challenging an acquittal judgment under the Customs Act and Gold (Control) Act. The prosecution&#039;s evidence was found lacking, with discrepancies and insufficient corroboration leading to the conclusion that the accused did not consciously possess the contraband. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the acquittal order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247053</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>