<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 1020 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247051</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, emphasizing procedural fairness and the need to consider substantive rights, especially when public money is at stake. The Court highlighted the importance of allowing the appellant-Federation to provide and prove the authorization from the Board of Directors, remitting the matters back to the Trial Court for a fresh trial to ensure justice is served promptly and in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2017 17:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354414" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 1020 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247051</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, emphasizing procedural fairness and the need to consider substantive rights, especially when public money is at stake. The Court highlighted the importance of allowing the appellant-Federation to provide and prove the authorization from the Board of Directors, remitting the matters back to the Trial Court for a fresh trial to ensure justice is served promptly and in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247051</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>