<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 998 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247029</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, concluding that the addition of service tax confirmed by Ld CIT(A) was not justified under section 43B. The decision emphasized the importance of accounting practices and adherence to statutory provisions in dealing with tax liabilities, highlighting the significance of following the mercantile system of accounting for proper tax compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2014 07:41:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354382" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 998 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247029</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, concluding that the addition of service tax confirmed by Ld CIT(A) was not justified under section 43B. The decision emphasized the importance of accounting practices and adherence to statutory provisions in dealing with tax liabilities, highlighting the significance of following the mercantile system of accounting for proper tax compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247029</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>