<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Drops Demand Beyond Limitation Due to Bona Fide Doubt on Reimbursement Inclusion in Assessable Value.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=18358</link>
    <description>Since during the period of dispute, there were conflicting decisions on the point of dispute in this case because of which the appellant could have entertained a bonafide doubt about inclusion of reimbursement expenses in the assessable value - demand beyond normal period of limitation dropped - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2014 18:50:24 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2014 18:50:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354379" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Drops Demand Beyond Limitation Due to Bona Fide Doubt on Reimbursement Inclusion in Assessable Value.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=18358</link>
      <description>Since during the period of dispute, there were conflicting decisions on the point of dispute in this case because of which the appellant could have entertained a bonafide doubt about inclusion of reimbursement expenses in the assessable value - demand beyond normal period of limitation dropped - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2014 18:50:24 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=18358</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>