<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 1105 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164737</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the writ petition, ruling in favor of the sugar manufacturing company. The assessment order under the OVAT Act was quashed as the assessing authority incorrectly taxed sugarcane used in sugar production, which was exempt under the Act. The court emphasized the need for a correct interpretation of tax laws and directed the Revenue to refund the amount deposited by the petitioner with interest if delayed, within three months.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2014 19:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354371" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 1105 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164737</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the writ petition, ruling in favor of the sugar manufacturing company. The assessment order under the OVAT Act was quashed as the assessing authority incorrectly taxed sugarcane used in sugar production, which was exempt under the Act. The court emphasized the need for a correct interpretation of tax laws and directed the Revenue to refund the amount deposited by the petitioner with interest if delayed, within three months.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164737</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>