https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164733 The Tribunal set aside the penalty order and subsequent revisional orders in a case where a public transport company challenged the seizure of goods transported for its own use, not for sale, under the West Bengal VAT Act. The Tribunal found the penalty unwarranted due to the company's lack of intent to sell the goods and the delay in communication about the seizure. The decision was made by the Tribunal, comprising Pradipta Ray and Deb Kumar Chakraborti, JJ., granting relief to the petitioner without costs. en-us Wed, 17 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 29 Apr 2014 18:14:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164733 The Tribunal set aside the penalty order and subsequent revisional orders in a case where a public transport company challenged the seizure of goods transported for its own use, not for sale, under the West Bengal VAT Act. The Tribunal found the penalty unwarranted due to the company's lack of intent to sell the goods and the delay in communication about the seizure. The decision was made by the Tribunal, comprising Pradipta Ray and Deb Kumar Chakraborti, JJ., granting relief to the petitioner without costs. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 17 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164733