<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (1) TMI 829 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164730</link>
    <description>The Punjab and Haryana High Court ruled in favor of the dealer in a 2009 case involving the assessment for the year 1986-87. The court held that no additional tax could be levied under the Punjab General Sales Tax Act when a lower rate was prescribed under the Central Sales Tax Act. The decision of the Tribunal to charge additional tax and interest was set aside, and the matter was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2014 12:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354364" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (1) TMI 829 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164730</link>
      <description>The Punjab and Haryana High Court ruled in favor of the dealer in a 2009 case involving the assessment for the year 1986-87. The court held that no additional tax could be levied under the Punjab General Sales Tax Act when a lower rate was prescribed under the Central Sales Tax Act. The decision of the Tribunal to charge additional tax and interest was set aside, and the matter was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164730</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>