<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 1181 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164726</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, holding that they were entitled to the relief under the Notification dated July 27, 1970, and the benefits of Section 5(3) of the Central Sales Tax Act. As a result, the assessment order and the decisions of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner and the Tribunal were overturned. The writ petition was granted, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2014 09:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354360" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 1181 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164726</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, holding that they were entitled to the relief under the Notification dated July 27, 1970, and the benefits of Section 5(3) of the Central Sales Tax Act. As a result, the assessment order and the decisions of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner and the Tribunal were overturned. The writ petition was granted, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164726</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>