https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247022 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, quashing the demand for interest on the disputed tax amount for the specified period. The court found that the petitioner had filed the cheque for the admitted tax within the required time, and the department's claim of non-encashment was contradicted by evidence from the bank. Emphasizing the department's duty to follow proper procedures and notify the petitioner about cheque status, the court held that the demand for interest was unjustified, citing previous judgments supporting the petitioner's position. en-us Thu, 04 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 29 Apr 2014 17:39:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247022 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, quashing the demand for interest on the disputed tax amount for the specified period. The court found that the petitioner had filed the cheque for the admitted tax within the required time, and the department's claim of non-encashment was contradicted by evidence from the bank. Emphasizing the department's duty to follow proper procedures and notify the petitioner about cheque status, the court held that the demand for interest was unjustified, citing previous judgments supporting the petitioner's position. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 04 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247022