<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 989 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247020</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the tax appeal, upholding the decision of the CESTAT. It found the respondent not liable for outstanding excise dues as they had only purchased the land and machinery, not the entire business. The Court emphasized that liability for excise dues is contingent on acquiring the whole business, as per legal provisions and precedents, ruling in favor of the respondent based on this interpretation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2014 12:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354349" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 989 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247020</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the tax appeal, upholding the decision of the CESTAT. It found the respondent not liable for outstanding excise dues as they had only purchased the land and machinery, not the entire business. The Court emphasized that liability for excise dues is contingent on acquiring the whole business, as per legal provisions and precedents, ruling in favor of the respondent based on this interpretation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247020</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>