<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (5) TMI 1061 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164725</link>
    <description>Pumping out water from a mine was held not to fall within &quot;manufacture, production, processing or repair of goods&quot; under s.3(3) of the Rajasthan Electricity (Duty) Act, 1962, so as to attract exemption/reduced duty under the relevant notifications. SC applied the ordinary meaning of &quot;manufacture&quot; as emergence of a new and distinct commercial product; excavation of stone and cutting/polishing into slabs did not create a new product, and pumping out water was not integrally connected with any manufacturing operation. Relying on evidence of separate metering and findings that pumping electricity was not used in the manufacturing business, SC held the duty was leviable on such consumption and allowed the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2025 13:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354348" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (5) TMI 1061 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164725</link>
      <description>Pumping out water from a mine was held not to fall within &quot;manufacture, production, processing or repair of goods&quot; under s.3(3) of the Rajasthan Electricity (Duty) Act, 1962, so as to attract exemption/reduced duty under the relevant notifications. SC applied the ordinary meaning of &quot;manufacture&quot; as emergence of a new and distinct commercial product; excavation of stone and cutting/polishing into slabs did not create a new product, and pumping out water was not integrally connected with any manufacturing operation. Relying on evidence of separate metering and findings that pumping electricity was not used in the manufacturing business, SC held the duty was leviable on such consumption and allowed the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164725</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>