<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (4) TMI 697 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164722</link>
    <description>Rule 103 of the West Bengal Value Added Tax Rules, 2005 makes the forty-eight-hour facility for producing way-bills and supporting documents discretionary and conditional, not automatic. The transporter or person in charge must present the prescribed documents at the check-post, and any request for time must be supported by a written explanation for non-production. Read with Sections 73 and 76 of the Act, the provision does not confer an absolute right to produce documents after interception. Where no reasonable explanation is given at the check-post or on interception, seizure is valid and the challenge to the seizure fails.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2014 17:09:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354345" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (4) TMI 697 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164722</link>
      <description>Rule 103 of the West Bengal Value Added Tax Rules, 2005 makes the forty-eight-hour facility for producing way-bills and supporting documents discretionary and conditional, not automatic. The transporter or person in charge must present the prescribed documents at the check-post, and any request for time must be supported by a written explanation for non-production. Read with Sections 73 and 76 of the Act, the provision does not confer an absolute right to produce documents after interception. Where no reasonable explanation is given at the check-post or on interception, seizure is valid and the challenge to the seizure fails.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164722</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>