<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 950 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164717</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Joint Commissioner III&#039;s decision that the contract between the assessee and railways involved supply of materials, affirming tax liability and reducing penalty to 50%. The court found evidence supporting material supply in the contract clauses and the assessee&#039;s purchase of materials. The appeal was dismissed as the court deemed the decision well-founded with no legal basis for interference, resulting in the dismissal of the appeals without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2014 14:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354340" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 950 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164717</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Joint Commissioner III&#039;s decision that the contract between the assessee and railways involved supply of materials, affirming tax liability and reducing penalty to 50%. The court found evidence supporting material supply in the contract clauses and the assessee&#039;s purchase of materials. The appeal was dismissed as the court deemed the decision well-founded with no legal basis for interference, resulting in the dismissal of the appeals without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164717</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>