<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 889 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164713</link>
    <description>The exemption notification granting relief from additional surcharge continued to operate despite deletion and later reintroduction of the charging provision, because it had not been cancelled or withdrawn under the enabling power in section 17 of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959. A mere legislative deletion followed by reintroduction of a substantially unchanged charging provision did not nullify the notification. The benefit of the exemption therefore remained available and had to be extended to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2014 19:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354336" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 889 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164713</link>
      <description>The exemption notification granting relief from additional surcharge continued to operate despite deletion and later reintroduction of the charging provision, because it had not been cancelled or withdrawn under the enabling power in section 17 of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959. A mere legislative deletion followed by reintroduction of a substantially unchanged charging provision did not nullify the notification. The benefit of the exemption therefore remained available and had to be extended to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164713</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>