<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (8) TMI 870 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164698</link>
    <description>The High Court of Madras quashed the respondent&#039;s order for the assessment year 1997-98 and remitted the matter for fresh consideration. The court directed the respondent to pass appropriate orders after considering the petitioner&#039;s objections, allowing the petitioner to make necessary objections within four weeks. The respondent was instructed to pass appropriate orders within twelve weeks. The writ petition was allowed with no costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2014 14:04:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354321" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (8) TMI 870 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164698</link>
      <description>The High Court of Madras quashed the respondent&#039;s order for the assessment year 1997-98 and remitted the matter for fresh consideration. The court directed the respondent to pass appropriate orders after considering the petitioner&#039;s objections, allowing the petitioner to make necessary objections within four weeks. The respondent was instructed to pass appropriate orders within twelve weeks. The writ petition was allowed with no costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164698</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>