https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164696 The court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the assessing officer was not justified in reopening the assessment based on the disclosed suppressed turnover. It was emphasized that assessing escaped turnover should precede invoking relevant legal provisions. Criticism was directed at the authorities for re-adding the suppressed turnover during re-determination. The judgment favored the assessee, answering the legal question in their favor and allowing the tax case with no costs. en-us Wed, 05 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Nov 2014 12:38:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164696 The court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the assessing officer was not justified in reopening the assessment based on the disclosed suppressed turnover. It was emphasized that assessing escaped turnover should precede invoking relevant legal provisions. Criticism was directed at the authorities for re-adding the suppressed turnover during re-determination. The judgment favored the assessee, answering the legal question in their favor and allowing the tax case with no costs. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 05 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164696