<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 982 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247013</link>
    <description>A Foreign Trade Policy restriction barring reprocessing of garments and other recyclable textile materials under the EOU scheme was treated as a valid condition for renewal and extension of a Letter of Permission, but it could not be used to cut short an already extended permission. Because the units had obtained extensions and arranged their affairs in reliance on that continuation, sudden curtailment without fresh policy change or overriding public interest was held barred by promissory estoppel and arbitrary under Articles 14 and 19(1)(g). The curtailed order was quashed to the extent it shortened the permission, and the earlier extension was restored for its remaining period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2014 14:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354307" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 982 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247013</link>
      <description>A Foreign Trade Policy restriction barring reprocessing of garments and other recyclable textile materials under the EOU scheme was treated as a valid condition for renewal and extension of a Letter of Permission, but it could not be used to cut short an already extended permission. Because the units had obtained extensions and arranged their affairs in reliance on that continuation, sudden curtailment without fresh policy change or overriding public interest was held barred by promissory estoppel and arbitrary under Articles 14 and 19(1)(g). The curtailed order was quashed to the extent it shortened the permission, and the earlier extension was restored for its remaining period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247013</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>