<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 935 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164688</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the revision, holding the dealer liable to pay tax on coal turnover purchased from unregistered dealers. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the tax was overturned after the Supreme Court ruled in a previous case that both the original and amended versions of the relevant section were valid legislation. Consequently, the Department&#039;s application for rectification was accepted, affirming the tax liability on the turnover.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2014 12:17:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354296" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 935 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164688</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the revision, holding the dealer liable to pay tax on coal turnover purchased from unregistered dealers. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the tax was overturned after the Supreme Court ruled in a previous case that both the original and amended versions of the relevant section were valid legislation. Consequently, the Department&#039;s application for rectification was accepted, affirming the tax liability on the turnover.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164688</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>