<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 789 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164677</link>
    <description>The Court ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that jointings do not fall within entry 25 concerning asbestos sheets and fittings for the assessment year 1988-89. The questions of law raised by the assessee were answered in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue. The revisional authority granted benefit to the assessee for subsequent assessment years, confirming that jointings do not fall within entry 25.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2014 10:56:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354285" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 789 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164677</link>
      <description>The Court ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that jointings do not fall within entry 25 concerning asbestos sheets and fittings for the assessment year 1988-89. The questions of law raised by the assessee were answered in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue. The revisional authority granted benefit to the assessee for subsequent assessment years, confirming that jointings do not fall within entry 25.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164677</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>