<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (12) TMI 887 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164668</link>
    <description>Penalty under section 12(3)(b) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, read with section 9(2A) of the Central Sales Tax Act, was confined to best judgment assessments and did not extend to an assessment made under section 12(1) on the basis of the assessee&#039;s accounts. As the assessment was not a best judgment estimate but was completed from returned accounts, the penal provision was inapplicable. The Tribunal&#039;s deletion of the penalty was therefore upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2014 10:14:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354268" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (12) TMI 887 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164668</link>
      <description>Penalty under section 12(3)(b) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, read with section 9(2A) of the Central Sales Tax Act, was confined to best judgment assessments and did not extend to an assessment made under section 12(1) on the basis of the assessee&#039;s accounts. As the assessment was not a best judgment estimate but was completed from returned accounts, the penal provision was inapplicable. The Tribunal&#039;s deletion of the penalty was therefore upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164668</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>