<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 932 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164666</link>
    <description>Free supply of cast iron scrap by the assessee to contractors for manufacture and supply of railway sleepers did not amount to a &quot;sale&quot; within the meaning of section 2(h) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948. Following an earlier decision on the same kind of transaction, the Court treated the transfer as outside the statutory definition of sale and, as a result, held that no sales tax liability arose on that supply.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2014 10:10:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354266" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 932 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164666</link>
      <description>Free supply of cast iron scrap by the assessee to contractors for manufacture and supply of railway sleepers did not amount to a &quot;sale&quot; within the meaning of section 2(h) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948. Following an earlier decision on the same kind of transaction, the Court treated the transfer as outside the statutory definition of sale and, as a result, held that no sales tax liability arose on that supply.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164666</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>