https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164662 For a suit seeking compensation for wrong done to movable property, territorial jurisdiction may lie where the wrongful act's consequence and resulting damage are felt. Construing Section 19 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the court treated "wrong done" as covering both the act and its effect, and held that Ernakulam had jurisdiction because the timber was meant for delivery there and the loss was felt there. Objections to place of suing under Section 21 must be raised at the earliest opportunity and may be waived by conduct; participation in cross-examination and part-trial amounted to waiver, so return of the plaint at that stage was unsustainable. en-us Wed, 18 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 14 Nov 2014 10:42:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164662 For a suit seeking compensation for wrong done to movable property, territorial jurisdiction may lie where the wrongful act's consequence and resulting damage are felt. Construing Section 19 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the court treated "wrong done" as covering both the act and its effect, and held that Ernakulam had jurisdiction because the timber was meant for delivery there and the loss was felt there. Objections to place of suing under Section 21 must be raised at the earliest opportunity and may be waived by conduct; participation in cross-examination and part-trial amounted to waiver, so return of the plaint at that stage was unsustainable. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 18 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164662