<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (6) TMI 571 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164656</link>
    <description>A transaction may be treated as a sale where the assessee fails to prove that goods were supplied on approval basis and later rejected by the purchaser. The absence of account books, correspondence, defect details, or movement records for returned goods weakened the approval-and-rejection plea, while receipt of 95% of the price and dispatch of goods from Uttar Pradesh to Gujarat supported sale treatment. A finding that the goods were not in a deliverable state could not stand without supporting material. The appellate authority also had to meet the reasons recorded by the authority below before reversing its conclusion; failure to do so rendered the order unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2014 16:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354230" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (6) TMI 571 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164656</link>
      <description>A transaction may be treated as a sale where the assessee fails to prove that goods were supplied on approval basis and later rejected by the purchaser. The absence of account books, correspondence, defect details, or movement records for returned goods weakened the approval-and-rejection plea, while receipt of 95% of the price and dispatch of goods from Uttar Pradesh to Gujarat supported sale treatment. A finding that the goods were not in a deliverable state could not stand without supporting material. The appellate authority also had to meet the reasons recorded by the authority below before reversing its conclusion; failure to do so rendered the order unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164656</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>