<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (2) TMI 1097 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164649</link>
    <description>Rectification under section 22 of the U.P. Trade Tax Act is confined to mistakes apparent from the record, meaning errors that are obvious, patent and identifiable without detailed reasoning or investigation. A disputed classification issue over whether insulating varnish and thinner fell within &quot;paints and varnishes&quot; or constituted an &quot;adhesive&quot; was debatable and involved competing views on tax treatment, so it could not be corrected through rectification. An earlier decision treating the goods under a particular entry did not make the controversy an apparent mistake. The rectification order was therefore unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2014 17:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354223" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (2) TMI 1097 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164649</link>
      <description>Rectification under section 22 of the U.P. Trade Tax Act is confined to mistakes apparent from the record, meaning errors that are obvious, patent and identifiable without detailed reasoning or investigation. A disputed classification issue over whether insulating varnish and thinner fell within &quot;paints and varnishes&quot; or constituted an &quot;adhesive&quot; was debatable and involved competing views on tax treatment, so it could not be corrected through rectification. An earlier decision treating the goods under a particular entry did not make the controversy an apparent mistake. The rectification order was therefore unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164649</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>