https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164624 A statutory appeal was treated as an inefficacious remedy where the challenged fiscal clarification already bound subordinate authorities, so writ jurisdiction under Article 226 remained available. A later clarification could not retrospectively enhance sales tax on bajji mix, bonda mix and ginger coriander mix after the assessment had been completed on the earlier 4% basis. The enhanced 16% demand was therefore unsustainable, and the assessment position for the relevant period was restored to 4%. en-us Fri, 16 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 19 Dec 2014 14:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164624 A statutory appeal was treated as an inefficacious remedy where the challenged fiscal clarification already bound subordinate authorities, so writ jurisdiction under Article 226 remained available. A later clarification could not retrospectively enhance sales tax on bajji mix, bonda mix and ginger coriander mix after the assessment had been completed on the earlier 4% basis. The enhanced 16% demand was therefore unsustainable, and the assessment position for the relevant period was restored to 4%. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 16 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164624