https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164618 The court declined to entertain the writ petition without exhausting the statutory remedy of appeal, emphasizing the discretionary nature of the writ remedy. It found the special status granted to the petitioner to bypass the appellate forum as an inadvertent mistake and emphasized the duty to rectify errors. Dismissing concerns about the appeal being time-barred, the court chose not to exercise its power to entertain the petition, directing the petitioner to approach the appellate forum within three weeks. The appellate authority was instructed to expedite the case's decision within three months from the appeal filing date. en-us Wed, 18 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 14 Nov 2014 10:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164618 The court declined to entertain the writ petition without exhausting the statutory remedy of appeal, emphasizing the discretionary nature of the writ remedy. It found the special status granted to the petitioner to bypass the appellate forum as an inadvertent mistake and emphasized the duty to rectify errors. Dismissing concerns about the appeal being time-barred, the court chose not to exercise its power to entertain the petition, directing the petitioner to approach the appellate forum within three weeks. The appellate authority was instructed to expedite the case's decision within three months from the appeal filing date. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 18 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164618