<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (11) TMI 850 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164613</link>
    <description>A manufacturer with a recognition certificate under section 4B of the U.P. Trade Tax Act could not claim raw-material exemption merely because finished goods were sold to an exporter against form H. The article explains that a sale to an exporter is not the same as a sale in the course of export; only transactions falling within the statutory meaning of export, as interpreted under the Central Sales Tax Act, qualify for export-linked relief. It also states that a trade tax circular inconsistent with the Supreme Court&#039;s declaration of law cannot prevail, so the reopening and denial of exemption were sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2014 14:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354186" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (11) TMI 850 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164613</link>
      <description>A manufacturer with a recognition certificate under section 4B of the U.P. Trade Tax Act could not claim raw-material exemption merely because finished goods were sold to an exporter against form H. The article explains that a sale to an exporter is not the same as a sale in the course of export; only transactions falling within the statutory meaning of export, as interpreted under the Central Sales Tax Act, qualify for export-linked relief. It also states that a trade tax circular inconsistent with the Supreme Court&#039;s declaration of law cannot prevail, so the reopening and denial of exemption were sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164613</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>