<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 898 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164611</link>
    <description>An assessee claiming that iron and steel received from outside the State were consumed in erecting plant and machinery must prove that asserted captive use with credible evidence under section 6A of the Central Sales Tax Act. Balance sheets, invoices, bills and certificates were found insufficient to establish actual utilisation at the Hassan unit, so the authorities were justified in treating the goods as taxable turnover and restoring the assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2014 10:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354184" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 898 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164611</link>
      <description>An assessee claiming that iron and steel received from outside the State were consumed in erecting plant and machinery must prove that asserted captive use with credible evidence under section 6A of the Central Sales Tax Act. Balance sheets, invoices, bills and certificates were found insufficient to establish actual utilisation at the Hassan unit, so the authorities were justified in treating the goods as taxable turnover and restoring the assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164611</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>