<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 1126 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164610</link>
    <description>A writ challenge to a show-cause notice proposing service tax, interest and penalty for services received from outside India was not entertained at the threshold. The Court declined to decide the taxability dispute in writ proceedings and held that the assessee should first place objections before the adjudicating authority. The respondent was then required to consider those objections and pass a reasoned final order, leaving the statutory adjudication process to proceed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2014 15:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354183" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 1126 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164610</link>
      <description>A writ challenge to a show-cause notice proposing service tax, interest and penalty for services received from outside India was not entertained at the threshold. The Court declined to decide the taxability dispute in writ proceedings and held that the assessee should first place objections before the adjudicating authority. The respondent was then required to consider those objections and pass a reasoned final order, leaving the statutory adjudication process to proceed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164610</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>