<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (8) TMI 863 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164593</link>
    <description>A factual finding based on survey material, diary entries, loose papers and stock records that the dealer was engaged in sale and purchase of bullion and gold ornaments was upheld because no perversity or illegality was shown. The plea that the transactions were only job work on labour basis was rejected. The Tribunal was also held unable to levy additional tax on ornament and bullion turnover for the first time when that levy had not been made in assessment and was not part of the subject-matter of the appeal. The additional tax was therefore deleted, while the finding on sale activity was maintained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2014 10:33:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354166" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (8) TMI 863 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164593</link>
      <description>A factual finding based on survey material, diary entries, loose papers and stock records that the dealer was engaged in sale and purchase of bullion and gold ornaments was upheld because no perversity or illegality was shown. The plea that the transactions were only job work on labour basis was rejected. The Tribunal was also held unable to levy additional tax on ornament and bullion turnover for the first time when that levy had not been made in assessment and was not part of the subject-matter of the appeal. The additional tax was therefore deleted, while the finding on sale activity was maintained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164593</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>