https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246987 The Tribunal set aside the demand, interest, and penalty imposed on the appellant for providing interior decorator services. It ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that the activities undertaken, such as plantation of trees and maintenance work, were execution-based rather than advisory or consultancy services as defined under the Finance Act. The Tribunal found that the appellant's work orders focused on execution and not on providing advice, consultancy, or technical assistance, leading to the appeal being allowed. en-us Fri, 28 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 12 Sep 2014 11:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246987 The Tribunal set aside the demand, interest, and penalty imposed on the appellant for providing interior decorator services. It ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that the activities undertaken, such as plantation of trees and maintenance work, were execution-based rather than advisory or consultancy services as defined under the Finance Act. The Tribunal found that the appellant's work orders focused on execution and not on providing advice, consultancy, or technical assistance, leading to the appeal being allowed. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 28 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246987