<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 945 - Punjab and Haryana High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246976</link>
    <description>Inherent powers were used to quash an FIR, challan and later criminal proceedings where the property earlier sold and forming the basis of the surety bonds had been repurchased by the petitioner&#039;s husband. The repurchase restored ownership to the surety provider, and the Court treated further prosecution as serving no useful purpose. The proceedings were therefore quashed in full.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2014 07:35:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354125" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 945 - Punjab and Haryana High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246976</link>
      <description>Inherent powers were used to quash an FIR, challan and later criminal proceedings where the property earlier sold and forming the basis of the surety bonds had been repurchased by the petitioner&#039;s husband. The repurchase restored ownership to the surety provider, and the Court treated further prosecution as serving no useful purpose. The proceedings were therefore quashed in full.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246976</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>