https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164584 A finding that a dealer was not dealing in pure silk sarees was treated as an inference from primary facts, not a question of law. The court held that comparison of the disputed sarees with pure silk samples, physical verification, admitted facts, and market price comparison provided sufficient material for the Tribunal's conclusion. A factual finding can be interfered with only if there is no evidence or if it is perverse; mere disagreement between authorities does not convert it into a legal issue. The reference therefore did not disclose a question of law, and the revisional challenge failed, leaving the Tribunal's view undisturbed. en-us Fri, 30 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Oct 2014 11:43:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164584 A finding that a dealer was not dealing in pure silk sarees was treated as an inference from primary facts, not a question of law. The court held that comparison of the disputed sarees with pure silk samples, physical verification, admitted facts, and market price comparison provided sufficient material for the Tribunal's conclusion. A factual finding can be interfered with only if there is no evidence or if it is perverse; mere disagreement between authorities does not convert it into a legal issue. The reference therefore did not disclose a question of law, and the revisional challenge failed, leaving the Tribunal's view undisturbed. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 30 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164584