<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 1177 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164571</link>
    <description>Mandatory notice to the consignee under the amended Punjab Value Added Tax regime was treated as a compulsory precondition for penalty proceedings, and non-service of that notice was said to vitiate the penalty order. The court also noted that penalty for transit-related non-compliance cannot be sustained where the transport documents are complete, the transaction is otherwise accounted for, and no intention to evade tax can be inferred. Mere non-reporting at the ICC barrier, on those facts, was held insufficient to establish tax evasion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2014 11:08:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354081" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 1177 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164571</link>
      <description>Mandatory notice to the consignee under the amended Punjab Value Added Tax regime was treated as a compulsory precondition for penalty proceedings, and non-service of that notice was said to vitiate the penalty order. The court also noted that penalty for transit-related non-compliance cannot be sustained where the transport documents are complete, the transaction is otherwise accounted for, and no intention to evade tax can be inferred. Mere non-reporting at the ICC barrier, on those facts, was held insufficient to establish tax evasion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164571</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>