<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 895 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164567</link>
    <description>Extension of the assessment limitation period under section 11(10) requires reasons recorded in writing and, where the statute does not expressly or necessarily exclude it, compliance with natural justice. Because an extension directly affects the assessee&#039;s rights, it must follow a hearing and be communicated before taking effect; an uncommunicated extension made without hearing cannot prevent the assessment from becoming time-barred. Transfer of an assessment case under rule 39C likewise requires recorded reasons and a reasonable opportunity of hearing wherever possible. Repeated transfers without material evidencing reasons or justification for denying a hearing do not satisfy those safeguards. The assessment was therefore time-barred and unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2014 18:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354077" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 895 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164567</link>
      <description>Extension of the assessment limitation period under section 11(10) requires reasons recorded in writing and, where the statute does not expressly or necessarily exclude it, compliance with natural justice. Because an extension directly affects the assessee&#039;s rights, it must follow a hearing and be communicated before taking effect; an uncommunicated extension made without hearing cannot prevent the assessment from becoming time-barred. Transfer of an assessment case under rule 39C likewise requires recorded reasons and a reasonable opportunity of hearing wherever possible. Repeated transfers without material evidencing reasons or justification for denying a hearing do not satisfy those safeguards. The assessment was therefore time-barred and unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164567</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>