<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 784 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164566</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, Arraycom, in a case concerning the interpretation of its bid price inclusive of sales tax. The court found that Prasar Bharati&#039;s adjustment of Arraycom&#039;s bid price by adding sales tax was incorrect and arbitrary, leading to the contract being awarded to another bidder unjustly. As a result, the court set aside the contract award to the other bidder and directed Prasar Bharati to award the contract to Arraycom at its original bid price, emphasizing the importance of accurate bid interpretation and judicial review in ensuring fairness in procurement processes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2014 17:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354076" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 784 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164566</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, Arraycom, in a case concerning the interpretation of its bid price inclusive of sales tax. The court found that Prasar Bharati&#039;s adjustment of Arraycom&#039;s bid price by adding sales tax was incorrect and arbitrary, leading to the contract being awarded to another bidder unjustly. As a result, the court set aside the contract award to the other bidder and directed Prasar Bharati to award the contract to Arraycom at its original bid price, emphasizing the importance of accurate bid interpretation and judicial review in ensuring fairness in procurement processes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164566</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>