https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164563 Where an efficacious statutory appellate remedy exists in tax matters, writ jurisdiction will ordinarily not be used to bypass the statutory scheme, and interference is reserved for exceptional cases such as lack of jurisdiction, gross abuse of power, or victimisation. The binding law declared by the Supreme Court continues to govern under Article 141 until expressly altered, and a later doubt expressed by another Bench does not suspend that position. The writ appeals were therefore not entertained and were dismissed at the threshold, leaving the appellants to pursue the statutory appellate remedy; the High Court also declined to examine the assessment orders on merits. en-us Wed, 07 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 30 Oct 2014 19:16:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164563 Where an efficacious statutory appellate remedy exists in tax matters, writ jurisdiction will ordinarily not be used to bypass the statutory scheme, and interference is reserved for exceptional cases such as lack of jurisdiction, gross abuse of power, or victimisation. The binding law declared by the Supreme Court continues to govern under Article 141 until expressly altered, and a later doubt expressed by another Bench does not suspend that position. The writ appeals were therefore not entertained and were dismissed at the threshold, leaving the appellants to pursue the statutory appellate remedy; the High Court also declined to examine the assessment orders on merits. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 07 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164563