<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 882 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164562</link>
    <description>A writ challenge to an assessment order on limitation was declined because the plea depended on disputed facts and a mixed question of fact and law. The Court held that, where the statute provides an effective appellate remedy, the limitation issue should ordinarily be pursued in that hierarchy rather than examined first in writ jurisdiction. The petitioner was directed to file an appeal under the Act, and if filed within two weeks, it was to be considered expeditiously without insisting on immediate deposit of 25 per cent of the demand at that stage.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2014 10:03:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354072" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 882 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164562</link>
      <description>A writ challenge to an assessment order on limitation was declined because the plea depended on disputed facts and a mixed question of fact and law. The Court held that, where the statute provides an effective appellate remedy, the limitation issue should ordinarily be pursued in that hierarchy rather than examined first in writ jurisdiction. The petitioner was directed to file an appeal under the Act, and if filed within two weeks, it was to be considered expeditiously without insisting on immediate deposit of 25 per cent of the demand at that stage.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164562</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>