<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 1094 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164558</link>
    <description>A Government order issued under a textile policy could not substitute a statutory exemption under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 for purchase tax on cotton purchases. The Court applied its earlier principle that tax exemption must flow from the Act itself and cannot be created by executive order, even where the order is linked to a State policy. On that basis, the dealer&#039;s claim to exemption for cotton used in the spinning mill was rejected, and the appeal failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2014 18:51:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354068" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 1094 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164558</link>
      <description>A Government order issued under a textile policy could not substitute a statutory exemption under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 for purchase tax on cotton purchases. The Court applied its earlier principle that tax exemption must flow from the Act itself and cannot be created by executive order, even where the order is linked to a State policy. On that basis, the dealer&#039;s claim to exemption for cotton used in the spinning mill was rejected, and the appeal failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164558</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>