<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 908 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246939</link>
    <description>The court invalidated the notification dated 13th May 2013 issued by the DGFT due to lack of authority and procedural irregularities, quashing it. However, the court upheld the notification dated 25th June 2013 issued by the Ministry of Finance regarding tariff values. The court emphasized limited judicial review of show cause notices and allowed the writ petitions challenging the notifications and show cause notice to continue, ultimately disposing of the case by quashing one notification and upholding the other.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2014 18:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354039" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 908 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246939</link>
      <description>The court invalidated the notification dated 13th May 2013 issued by the DGFT due to lack of authority and procedural irregularities, quashing it. However, the court upheld the notification dated 25th June 2013 issued by the Ministry of Finance regarding tariff values. The court emphasized limited judicial review of show cause notices and allowed the writ petitions challenging the notifications and show cause notice to continue, ultimately disposing of the case by quashing one notification and upholding the other.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246939</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>