<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 899 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246930</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to dismiss the Tax Case (Appeal) due to the assessee&#039;s lack of substantial evidence, contradictory positions, and failure to comply with legal requirements in income tax assessments. The court emphasized the significance of maintaining accurate accounts, providing solid evidence, and avoiding inconsistencies in tax matters, ultimately highlighting the importance of transparency and adherence to legal obligations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2015 17:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354030" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 899 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246930</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to dismiss the Tax Case (Appeal) due to the assessee&#039;s lack of substantial evidence, contradictory positions, and failure to comply with legal requirements in income tax assessments. The court emphasized the significance of maintaining accurate accounts, providing solid evidence, and avoiding inconsistencies in tax matters, ultimately highlighting the importance of transparency and adherence to legal obligations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246930</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>