<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 891 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246922</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s cross objection, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision. The judgment emphasized assessing the substance of transactions over formality, stating that transactions for commercial expediency in the normal course of business did not fall under section 2(22)(e) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2014 16:37:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354022" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 891 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246922</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s cross objection, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision. The judgment emphasized assessing the substance of transactions over formality, stating that transactions for commercial expediency in the normal course of business did not fall under section 2(22)(e) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246922</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>