<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 886 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246917</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing that penalty under section 271(1)(c) cannot be imposed solely based on disallowance of claims or differences in opinion among authorities, as supported by relevant case laws and judicial precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2014 16:36:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354017" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 886 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246917</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing that penalty under section 271(1)(c) cannot be imposed solely based on disallowance of claims or differences in opinion among authorities, as supported by relevant case laws and judicial precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246917</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>