<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Payment of Penalty</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=106748</link>
    <description>The department can demand a penalty under section 11AC if differential excise duty results from fraud, suppression or willful misstatement, and payment of the penalty may amount to an admission of culpability. Conversely, payment of differential duty with interest has been treated in some precedents as obviating penalty; where penalty is claimed despite payment with interest, an appeal is advised. The factual reasons for the differential are determinative.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2014 09:55:55 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:57:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=354012" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Payment of Penalty</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=106748</link>
      <description>The department can demand a penalty under section 11AC if differential excise duty results from fraud, suppression or willful misstatement, and payment of the penalty may amount to an admission of culpability. Conversely, payment of differential duty with interest has been treated in some precedents as obviating penalty; where penalty is claimed despite payment with interest, an appeal is advised. The factual reasons for the differential are determinative.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2014 09:55:55 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=106748</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>