https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164555 A revisional court may correct a trial finding that is vitiated by legal infirmity, and the landlord's bona fide need was upheld where oral evidence and surrounding circumstances showed lack of suitable premises and genuine business use. Subletting was also held unlawful because written consent given during the contractual tenancy did not continue after its expiry; a statutory tenancy did not authorise a fresh subtenancy without renewed written consent. Eviction was therefore sustained on both grounds, and comparative hardship did not survive for consideration. en-us Wed, 10 Oct 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Jul 2014 13:17:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164555 A revisional court may correct a trial finding that is vitiated by legal infirmity, and the landlord's bona fide need was upheld where oral evidence and surrounding circumstances showed lack of suitable premises and genuine business use. Subletting was also held unlawful because written consent given during the contractual tenancy did not continue after its expiry; a statutory tenancy did not authorise a fresh subtenancy without renewed written consent. Eviction was therefore sustained on both grounds, and comparative hardship did not survive for consideration. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 10 Oct 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=164555